Light shots
Author: s | 2025-04-24
Shot Light S Semi Recessed Shot Light S Flex Shot Light M Shot Light M Trimless Shot Light M Asymmetric Shot Light M Asymmetric Trimless Shot Light Big Shot Light. Luminous flux. 190 lm / 210 lm / 250 lm. Lighting efficiency. 86% / 90% / 92%. Power. 2,1 W. Dimming. No Dim. Color temperature. 2700K / 3000K / 4000K
SHOT LIGHT - Light Life - Jokerlight
Actually seems reasonably quick until you realise that the camera doesn’t wait for the AF system to focus before taking a picture, it just goes ahead a shoots as soon as you press the button. If you wait for the autofocus to finish the shot-to-shot time is a much more likely 2.3 seconds. The M380 has no continuous shooting mode, just a three-shot burst mode that shoots in just under three seconds, but needless to say doesn’t focus between shots.The autofocus system is reasonably quick in good light, but fails dismally in even a room lit by a 60W bulb, in other words light in which you can read a newspaper. It has no AF assist light, so it’s useless in the dark, however it will happily take a photo anyway even though it will come out as a dark burry mess. I had more disappointing low light shots from the M380 than from any other camera that I can recall.The camera’s overall image quality is pretty poor even for a camera in this price range. The lens is very soft right across the frame, and although it avoids excessive wide-angle distortion the corners of the frame suffer from visible chromatic aberration. Exposure metering and automatic white balance are both erratic, and colour rendition, something for which Kodak once had a good reputation, is terrible. Darker saturated colours are blotchy, brighter ones are over-exposed and both lack detail.The M380’s biggest problem is one that has plagued other recent Kodak cameras. Most 10MP cameras produce image files of between 3MB and 4.5MB, a compression ratio of around 7:1 to 10:1. The M380 produces shots averaging around 1.5MB, a compression rate of around 20:1, and as a result fine detail is lost, images are riddled with compression artefacts, and overall image quality suffers. Sure, it can fit over 300 shots on a 1GB card, but really what’s the point of putting a 10MP sensor in a camera if you then cripple it with tiny file sizes? It’s not like multi-gigabyte SD cards are particularly expensive.”’Verdict”’The Kodak EasyShare M380 is a reasonably cheap camera considering its specification, but it’s far from being good value. Indifferent build quality, a very limited range of poorly implemented features, non-existent low light performance and shoddy image quality make it one to avoid.”Over the next few pages we show a range of test shots. On this page the
Light Shot (Shadow the Hedgehog)
As inputs and generates sparse codes, representing depth data, as outputs.4 Datasets and quality assessmentLight field datasets with diverse content characteristics are essential for the development and benchmarking of light field processing systems. Real-world light field data can be captured by plenoptic cameras such as lenslets, by an array of single-lens or plenoptic cameras, or using a single-lens moving camera, capturing the scene from different viewpoints. Synthetic light field data can be generated using computer simulation and view rendering. Content characteristics such as angular resolution and view sparsity, spatial resolution, scene complexity, specularity, and transparency can challenge light field imaging algorithms. Shafiee et al. [160] provided a detailed comparison of 33 light field datasets ranging from content-only datasets to specific task-based and quality assessment datasets. Although many datasets have been introduced in the literature, only a few of them have been widely adopted by the research community to evaluate light field imaging algorithms. Table 1 summarizes all the public datasets with their characteristics that have been used in the literature for benchmarking the learning-based compression, depth estimation, and reconstruction algorithms.The first public datasets in the domain such as Kalantari et al. [161] and EPFL [162] consist of realistic light fields captured using plenoptic Lytro Illum cameras. The 4D light field also known as HCI [163] includes 24 densely sampled synthetic light fields with accurate disparity information. In the Fraunhofer IIS dataset [164], Sony Alpha 7RII camera rigs were used to acquire density-sampled high-resolution light field images with wide baseline. The Stanford multiview light field dataset [165] consists of single Lytro shots as well as triple shots of three Lytro Illum cameras mounted together. More than 7000 light fields are collected in this dataset covering challenges such as non-Lambertian surfaces, occlusions, and specularity. INRIA [45] and WLF [56] are other recentLight Shot - The Noita Wiki
Noise level. We also tested the ISO 800 (433k) setting, which gave us a little brighter exposure with a moderately increased noise level. As we've been saying all along, the comparatively low noise level of the 800 ISO setting is very impressive. Despite the somewhat muted color saturation, everything else looks wonderful. Following is our standard resolution and quality series.Resolution/Quality series: Low-Light Tests Given the RD 3000's excellent shadow detail under normal shooting conditions, we weren't too surprised to see how well it did at low-light shooting. Well, maybe a little surprised at just how good the pictures actually were: It produced excellent, well-exposed images down to a light level of 1/4 of a foot-candle at its default ISO 200 sensitivity setting, and all the way down to 1/16 of a foot-candle at the higher ISO 800 setting. What was most surprising though, was how good the image quality was, even with very long exposures at ISO 800: Noise was very well controlled, and color balance was excellent all the way down. (We used the "daylight" white balance setting on these shots.) We don't have a good way of measuring low-light focusing ability, and in fact used manual focus on all these shots. We were particularly amazed that even the lowest-light samples still showed good detail in the briquettes, a very unusual accomplishment. Overall, an excellent performance!We've recently changed our test procedure to insure that the cameras we test are at a uniform 70 degrees F (~21 C) when we shoot the low light tests, and we proceed from the lowest light levels to the brightest. This insures that the camera electronics and sensor are at their lowest temperature when we test under the most sensitive conditions (longest exposures, highest ISO settings). CCD noise levels are very sensitive to temperature,. Shot Light S Semi Recessed Shot Light S Flex Shot Light M Shot Light M Trimless Shot Light M Asymmetric Shot Light M Asymmetric Trimless Shot Light Big Shot Light. Luminous flux. 190 lm / 210 lm / 250 lm. Lighting efficiency. 86% / 90% / 92%. Power. 2,1 W. Dimming. No Dim. Color temperature. 2700K / 3000K / 4000K Light Shot. Ammo Projectile Bullet Item. World of Warcraft Classic Projectile Bullet Item. Light Shot. Name Light Shot; Quality Common; Item Level 5; Type Projectile; Subtype Bullet; SlotLight Shot! on the App Store
Colorful, but hardly a big enough difference to be of any significance.Daylight photo samples, 1x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13At 2x, the Galaxy's superiority is even more pronounced.Daylight photo samples, 2x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13As projected, the OnePlus has a significant and readily-observable advantage at 3x - its photos simply have more definition and an overall finer quality to them.Daylight photo samples, 3x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13Zooming in further, the S25 Ultra's 5x images are, in turn, meaningfully better than the OP's 6x shots taken on its 3x camera. That said, the OnePlus results still hold up decently well even at 1:1 magnification.Daylight photo samples: Galaxy S25 Ultra (5x) • OnePlus 13 (6x)Comparing the ultrawides, we're essentially looking at a tie from a practical perspective.Daylight photo samples, 0.6x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13Selfies are a little nicer on the Galaxy in terms of resolved detail, and there's also the added benefit that you can do close-ups thanks to its autofocusing capability.Selfie samples: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13In the dark, the OnePlus 13's main camera produces notably better shots in full auto than what the Galaxy can muster - detail is better, noise is lower, dynamic range is wider.Low-light photo samples, 1x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13At 2x, the Galaxy does have a bit of a sharpness advantage, but the OnePlus is reasonably alright.Low-light photo samples, 2x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13We expected a bit more from the OnePlus at 3x, but it only manages decent results, similarly to the S25 Ultra, though the two do arrive there differently. The Galaxy's shots are sharp and noisy, the OP's 3x images are clean and softer.Low-light photo samples, 3x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13At the next zoom level, the Galaxy's admittedly suboptimal (noisy, mostly) 5x shots are notably better than the OP's 6x results.Low-light photo samples: Galaxy S25 Ultra (5x) • OnePlus 13 (6x)The ultrawide cameras are comparable in the dark, with a small sharpness advantage for the Galaxy.Low-light photo samples, 0.6x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13Video qualityBelow we have a few framegrabs from the videos taken by the two phones at each focal length so it's easier to compare to one another.When it comes to video quality, the OP13 has a better definition in the ultrawide footage. The Galaxy has a small advantage at 1x, and is significantly better at 2x. The 3x cameras are roughly similar, and at 5x/6x the Galaxy is again superior.Daylight video samples, 0.6x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13Daylight video samples, 1x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13Daylight video samples, 2x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13Daylight video samples, 3x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13DaylightRing Light Shot's - Pinterest
Both actresses are in the same light; the light matches the environment perfectly, which would have been impossible to replicate with greenscreen, frankly. And the performances speak for themselves.The dome-shaped lab where Ana [Carla Juri] creates replicants’ memory implants is one of the more unusual sets. Yes, it’s a big egg with no light source! [Laughs.] The design was inspired by the Darwin Centre Cocoon of the Natural History Museum in London. The shots that introduce Ana, where you see her in the forest that then dissolves into her lab, were actually shot in prep, whilst the lab was a set we shot late in the schedule. So it was quite a long time between the shooting of the plate and the interior, and we had to choose our angles very early on. We lit the lab almost entirely with LED ribbons recessed into a cove in the floor. It doesn’t look like much, but it was an enormous amount of light. There was a hole in the top of the dome that doesn’t appear in shot, and we put a small amount of LED soft light there using [Arri] LED SkyPanels, but it’s very minimal. Did the wall of glass separating Ana from her visitors present any concerns?It was suggested we shoot without the glass and add CG reflections in post, but that wouldn’t have looked right. I had the camera on an Aerocrane and Power Pod remote head — the same system that I regularly use — and there were a few instances where [visual-effects artists] had to paint out the camera’s reflection because there was no way to shoot without getting it in shot, but it was fairly forgiving.Ana’s creation of the birthday-party memory is a lovely bit of interactive lighting. How did you achieve that? First, we storyboarded the scene to determine all the angles we needed. We shot the children as an element during preproduction, lining up our shots with our actress but always keeping the children as a clean element. I used a circular tray of 250-watt bulbs on flicker generators to mimic the light that would be coming from the candles on the cake. Some shots we made with multiple cameras for the moment when the kids freeze but the cake is still spinning; using multiple cameras enabled the visual-effects team to manipulate the kids in three dimensions. We shot the birthday cakePerfect Dusk Shots: Capture Stunning Low Light Shots
Photo Stories1. Plan Your NarrativeBefore you begin shooting, outline your story. Consider:What message or emotion do you want to convey?Who or what is the subject of your story?Where will the story unfold?What key moments or elements need to be captured?2. Capture a Range of ShotsA well-rounded photo story often includes three types of shots:Wide Shots: Establish the setting and provide context.Medium Shots: Show interactions, relationships, or group dynamics.Close-Up Shots: Focus on details, emotions, or key elements.For example, in a story about a street vendor:Wide shots capture the bustling marketplace.Medium shots highlight the vendor interacting with customers.Close-ups showcase hands exchanging money or the vibrant colors of produce.3. Use Composition StrategicallyStrong composition enhances storytelling by directing the viewer’s eye and emphasizing the narrative.Leading Lines: Guide the viewer through the scene.Rule of Thirds: Place key elements off-center for balance.Layering: Add depth by including foreground, midground, and background elements.4. Play with LightingLighting sets the mood and atmosphere of your story.Golden Hour: Soft, warm light creates a nostalgic or romantic mood.High Contrast: Dramatic shadows and highlights enhance tension.Low Light: Dim conditions convey intimacy or mystery.5. Focus on AuthenticityCandid moments often tell the most genuine stories. Instead of directing your subjects, observe and capture their natural interactions and expressions.Types of Stories to Tell Through Photos1. Personal StoriesDocument your own life or that of someone close to you. This could include:Milestones: Birthdays, anniversaries, or graduations.Daily Life: Simple moments like a family dinner or a morning routine.Transformations: A personal journey, such as learning a new skill or recovering from a challenge.2. Cultural StoriesExplore and share traditions, festivals, or community rituals.Focus on the details that define the culture, such as clothing, food, or architecture.Be respectful and seek permission when photographing private or sacred events.3. Environmental StoriesHighlight the beauty and fragility of nature.Document ecosystems, wildlife, or natural phenomena.Use your images to raise awareness about environmental conservation.4. Event StoriesCover events such as weddings, protests, or concerts.Arrive early to scout the venue and plan your shots.Look for moments of emotion or interaction that capture the event’s essence.5. Conceptual StoriesCreate abstract or imaginative narratives.Use props, costumes, or special effects to build a fictionalLight Shot - Sonic Wiki Zone
There is quite a bit of detail, most surfaces look soft and a bit noisy. Both shadows and highlights are well-developed, and light sources are contained decently, though still not perfectly. Dynamic range and contrast are good. The colors are a bit cold but generally alright.Samsung Galaxy A25: 12.5MP main camera low-light samplesThe Galaxy A25 applies some automatic night mode procession on its own, but there is a dedicated manual Night mode as well, which has longer exposure times and does more image stacking. The resulting images are a bit sharper, with less noise and cleaner surfaces. Light sources are handled notably better, too.Samsung Galaxy A25: 12.5MP main camera night mode samples2x zoom shots from the main camera expectedly look noisier and softer than 1x ones. They are still very much usable, though.Samsung Galaxy A25: 12.5MP main camera 2x zoom low-light samplesNight mode doesn't seem to do a lot for these shots. The exposure is higher, which can lead to some clipped highlights and doesn't help shadows all that much, and that's about it.Samsung Galaxy A25: 12.5MP main camera 2x night mode samplesWe didn't expect much from the new 8MP ultrawide in low-light given its lackluster performance in daylight. The low light photos are decidedly soft and noisy without that much detail. The dynamic range, however, is quite alright for this sort of camera.Samsung Galaxy A25: 8MP ultrawide camera low-light samplesNight mode boosts exposure a bit and lightens everything up, but it doesn't really help develop darker areas or light sources any better. The amount of captured detail remains about the same, with a bit of extra sharpening applied to what is already there. This does make for an overall cleaner look, but it is quite artificial.Samsung Galaxy A25: 8MP ultrawide camera night mode samplesThe selfie camera fails to impress. Shot Light S Semi Recessed Shot Light S Flex Shot Light M Shot Light M Trimless Shot Light M Asymmetric Shot Light M Asymmetric Trimless Shot Light Big Shot Light. Luminous flux. 190 lm / 210 lm / 250 lm. Lighting efficiency. 86% / 90% / 92%. Power. 2,1 W. Dimming. No Dim. Color temperature. 2700K / 3000K / 4000K
Acne Light Shot - FaceGym - Sephora
Visit >>> Genuine cracked applications direct from the scene group. A Team-FTU project! 64bit | Multilingual | PreActivated CyberLink ColorDirector Ultra v12.6.4225.0 (x64) Multilingual Pre-Activated [FTUApps] Precision Color Grading, Professional Results. Create Cinematic Masterpieces. Discover a World of Visual Effects. Manipulate the lighting to change the aesthetic of your footage. Add realistic lights rays, light leaks and lens flares. Features: - Make Your Production Shine Sparkle Effect automatically detects a light source in your footage and enhances it with individual, fully customizable and animated sparks of light. - Illuminate Your Footage Manipulate the lighting to change the aesthetic of your footage. Add realistic lights rays, light leaks and lens flares. - Craft Your Own Breathtaking Results Create a Hollywood look with professional grading tools. Finesse the details, refine your look and sharpen your focus with superior controls. - Smarter Selection, Easier Edits Be selective with your edits – even on a moving subject. Get precise control over any object with the power of motion tracking. - Turn any Background Into a Green Screen Isolate any object in your video and create a customizable green screen to compose spectacular scenes. - Craft a Consistent, Professional look Harmonize colors throughout your videos without having to worry about lighting or contrast again. Import and export your Look-up Tables (LUTs) and take your color scheme with you. - Achieve Dynamic Effects with Keyframes Use customizable presets, make keyframe adjustments and control the intensity of each effect. - Customize Your Clips Create the perfect color effect for a premium cinematic feel. Apply a mask or create multiple color changes within a single clip with keyframes. - Instantly Match Your Shots Automatically replicate the color style from any reference video. Enhanced color match controls give you the ability to fine-tune your look. - Split Tone Adjust highlights, mid-tones & shadows to achieve both image balance and style. - Color Splash Isolate a color and adjust intensity to stylize your footage. - Color Shift Remap the color in your videos with a full spectrum color wheel. - Waveform Scope Easily evaluate the light and dark elements in your footage, no matter the quality of your monitor. Achieve accurate results and ensure superior uniformity between shots. - Parade Mode Quickly inspect the color balance of your shots with the red, green, and blue color channels. Use the graph to guide your adjustments for a seamless color grading experience.Light shot upload problem - YouTube
CyberLit is a powerful lighting tool for Cyberpunk 2077, originally developed by Hatti and later improved on and extended by Otis_Inf. It allows players to add custom lights in-game, radically widening the possibility for all kinds of creative shots. This guide aims to demystify the wide array of available controls, so you can take your shots to the next level.All the information presented in this guide has been inferred through observations and prior knowledge. As a result, some parts may be inaccurate or left unknown - there is a good chance they have negligible if any effects anyway.Diagrams of how the lights work in this guide aren't wholly accurate. They look soft and slightly diffused since they were captured in-game, through the fog weather. More details as to how I did it below!OperationCyberLit is integrated into the camera tools for Cyberpunk 2077. Once IGCS has been injected into the game, the default keybind to open the CyberLit menu is F2. Upon clicking Create light, you'll be greeted by a long list of controls. There isn't much need to change anything right now, as you will likely be returning to edit your lights quite often.Click Create at the bottom. You should see Light 1 added to the List of lights. Clicking Edit will open the list of controls again. Ctrl-clicking on a value will allow you to manually type one in.Creating a light will spawn it right where your camera currently is, and will point in the same direction if it's a directional light like a spotlight.TypeThere are three types of lights available exposed by CyberLit, Point, Spot and Area. These are analogous to the same types of lights found in 3D programs like Blender or Autodesk Maya.Point lights radiate light in all directions from a single point in 3D space.. Shot Light S Semi Recessed Shot Light S Flex Shot Light M Shot Light M Trimless Shot Light M Asymmetric Shot Light M Asymmetric Trimless Shot Light Big Shot Light. Luminous flux. 190 lm / 210 lm / 250 lm. Lighting efficiency. 86% / 90% / 92%. Power. 2,1 W. Dimming. No Dim. Color temperature. 2700K / 3000K / 4000KAmazon.com: Light Up Shot Glasses
Showcase your gains better than any filter could.The right tools can make your muscle selfies stand out from the crowd. Smart gear choices and photo editing skills will take your flex shots to the next level.Use a tripod or a friend for assistanceA tripod changes your muscle selfie game completely. I bought a Manfrotto action tripod last year and my photos improved right away. This compact tool lets you set up perfect shots without awkward arm angles.You can use the self-timer or a remote clicker to snap pics while holding your best flex pose. My tripod has helped me capture my progress shots from angles I couldn’t reach before.Friends often take better photos than mirrors can. Ask a buddy to snap your muscle shots for more natural results. They can move around to find the best angle while you focus on your pose.No tripod? No problem. I’ve placed my phone on stable surfaces like windowsills many times with good results. Practice using your setup in different places to get comfortable with it.Taking great muscle photos requires good tools, similar to a boudoir photo shoot for women. Next, we’ll look at how photo editing can enhance your muscle definition without looking fake.Edit carefully to enhance but not distortGood editing makes your muscle selfies pop without lying about your gains. Apps like Photoshop and Lightroom offer tools to highlight muscle definition through moderate contrast and clarity adjustments.The right Instagram filter can make a difference too – Hudson softens details while Ludwig brings out sun-lit effects. But don’t go overboard! Too much editing creates a fake look that misses the point of muscle selfies.Smart editing focuses on bringing out what’s already there. Use lighting tricks to show off your body angles rather than warping your actual shape.Heavy editing that makes you look totally different breaks trust with your followers. Stick to small tweaks that enhance your true physique – your actual gains deserve the spotlight.People Also AskWhat lighting works best for muscle selfies?Natural light is your best friend for muscle photos. Try to stand near a window or go outside during the golden hour – that’s early morning or late afternoon. This soft light will show off your muscle cuts better than harsh overhead lights.How can I find my best angle for flex photos?Everyone has a good side! Test different angles by taking practice shots. For most people, a slight turn to theComments
Actually seems reasonably quick until you realise that the camera doesn’t wait for the AF system to focus before taking a picture, it just goes ahead a shoots as soon as you press the button. If you wait for the autofocus to finish the shot-to-shot time is a much more likely 2.3 seconds. The M380 has no continuous shooting mode, just a three-shot burst mode that shoots in just under three seconds, but needless to say doesn’t focus between shots.The autofocus system is reasonably quick in good light, but fails dismally in even a room lit by a 60W bulb, in other words light in which you can read a newspaper. It has no AF assist light, so it’s useless in the dark, however it will happily take a photo anyway even though it will come out as a dark burry mess. I had more disappointing low light shots from the M380 than from any other camera that I can recall.The camera’s overall image quality is pretty poor even for a camera in this price range. The lens is very soft right across the frame, and although it avoids excessive wide-angle distortion the corners of the frame suffer from visible chromatic aberration. Exposure metering and automatic white balance are both erratic, and colour rendition, something for which Kodak once had a good reputation, is terrible. Darker saturated colours are blotchy, brighter ones are over-exposed and both lack detail.The M380’s biggest problem is one that has plagued other recent Kodak cameras. Most 10MP cameras produce image files of between 3MB and 4.5MB, a compression ratio of around 7:1 to 10:1. The M380 produces shots averaging around 1.5MB, a compression rate of around 20:1, and as a result fine detail is lost, images are riddled with compression artefacts, and overall image quality suffers. Sure, it can fit over 300 shots on a 1GB card, but really what’s the point of putting a 10MP sensor in a camera if you then cripple it with tiny file sizes? It’s not like multi-gigabyte SD cards are particularly expensive.”’Verdict”’The Kodak EasyShare M380 is a reasonably cheap camera considering its specification, but it’s far from being good value. Indifferent build quality, a very limited range of poorly implemented features, non-existent low light performance and shoddy image quality make it one to avoid.”Over the next few pages we show a range of test shots. On this page the
2025-04-02As inputs and generates sparse codes, representing depth data, as outputs.4 Datasets and quality assessmentLight field datasets with diverse content characteristics are essential for the development and benchmarking of light field processing systems. Real-world light field data can be captured by plenoptic cameras such as lenslets, by an array of single-lens or plenoptic cameras, or using a single-lens moving camera, capturing the scene from different viewpoints. Synthetic light field data can be generated using computer simulation and view rendering. Content characteristics such as angular resolution and view sparsity, spatial resolution, scene complexity, specularity, and transparency can challenge light field imaging algorithms. Shafiee et al. [160] provided a detailed comparison of 33 light field datasets ranging from content-only datasets to specific task-based and quality assessment datasets. Although many datasets have been introduced in the literature, only a few of them have been widely adopted by the research community to evaluate light field imaging algorithms. Table 1 summarizes all the public datasets with their characteristics that have been used in the literature for benchmarking the learning-based compression, depth estimation, and reconstruction algorithms.The first public datasets in the domain such as Kalantari et al. [161] and EPFL [162] consist of realistic light fields captured using plenoptic Lytro Illum cameras. The 4D light field also known as HCI [163] includes 24 densely sampled synthetic light fields with accurate disparity information. In the Fraunhofer IIS dataset [164], Sony Alpha 7RII camera rigs were used to acquire density-sampled high-resolution light field images with wide baseline. The Stanford multiview light field dataset [165] consists of single Lytro shots as well as triple shots of three Lytro Illum cameras mounted together. More than 7000 light fields are collected in this dataset covering challenges such as non-Lambertian surfaces, occlusions, and specularity. INRIA [45] and WLF [56] are other recent
2025-04-05Colorful, but hardly a big enough difference to be of any significance.Daylight photo samples, 1x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13At 2x, the Galaxy's superiority is even more pronounced.Daylight photo samples, 2x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13As projected, the OnePlus has a significant and readily-observable advantage at 3x - its photos simply have more definition and an overall finer quality to them.Daylight photo samples, 3x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13Zooming in further, the S25 Ultra's 5x images are, in turn, meaningfully better than the OP's 6x shots taken on its 3x camera. That said, the OnePlus results still hold up decently well even at 1:1 magnification.Daylight photo samples: Galaxy S25 Ultra (5x) • OnePlus 13 (6x)Comparing the ultrawides, we're essentially looking at a tie from a practical perspective.Daylight photo samples, 0.6x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13Selfies are a little nicer on the Galaxy in terms of resolved detail, and there's also the added benefit that you can do close-ups thanks to its autofocusing capability.Selfie samples: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13In the dark, the OnePlus 13's main camera produces notably better shots in full auto than what the Galaxy can muster - detail is better, noise is lower, dynamic range is wider.Low-light photo samples, 1x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13At 2x, the Galaxy does have a bit of a sharpness advantage, but the OnePlus is reasonably alright.Low-light photo samples, 2x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13We expected a bit more from the OnePlus at 3x, but it only manages decent results, similarly to the S25 Ultra, though the two do arrive there differently. The Galaxy's shots are sharp and noisy, the OP's 3x images are clean and softer.Low-light photo samples, 3x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13At the next zoom level, the Galaxy's admittedly suboptimal (noisy, mostly) 5x shots are notably better than the OP's 6x results.Low-light photo samples: Galaxy S25 Ultra (5x) • OnePlus 13 (6x)The ultrawide cameras are comparable in the dark, with a small sharpness advantage for the Galaxy.Low-light photo samples, 0.6x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13Video qualityBelow we have a few framegrabs from the videos taken by the two phones at each focal length so it's easier to compare to one another.When it comes to video quality, the OP13 has a better definition in the ultrawide footage. The Galaxy has a small advantage at 1x, and is significantly better at 2x. The 3x cameras are roughly similar, and at 5x/6x the Galaxy is again superior.Daylight video samples, 0.6x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13Daylight video samples, 1x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13Daylight video samples, 2x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13Daylight video samples, 3x: Galaxy S25 Ultra • OnePlus 13Daylight
2025-03-31